{"id":387,"date":"2019-05-28T08:05:14","date_gmt":"2019-05-28T08:05:14","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2021-10-05T13:14:03","modified_gmt":"2021-10-05T13:14:03","slug":"leakey-v-national-trust","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/cases\/leakey-v-national-trust.php","title":{"rendered":"Leakey v National Trust"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2>Legal Case Summary<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Leakey v National Trust [1980] QB 485 (CA)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"alert alert-info mb-3 mt-4\">Landowners in nuisance, and the knowledge of a danger to neighbours caused by natural deterioration of their property; The extent of the landowner\u2019s duty to take reasonable steps to avert this danger.<\/p>\n<h3>Facts<\/h3>\n<p>The claimant built two houses at the foot of a large hill on the defendant\u2019s land.\u00a0 Over a long period of time, soil and rubble had continuously, but slowly, fallen from the mound onto the claimant\u2019s properties, and onto their land, as a result of the natural process of erosion.\u00a0 After a very dry summer a large crack appeared in the surface of the mound, and the claimants drew the defendant\u2019s attention to the danger caused by a major fall of soil.\u00a0 The defendants denied any responsibility for the danger, arguing that it was an entirely natural process.\u00a0 Shortly after this, a large amount of soil and tree stumps fell from the mound onto the claimant\u2019s land, and the claimants brought an action in nuisance as a result of the damage done to their land and property and their interest in the use of their land being interfered with by virtue of the defendant\u2019s failure to take steps to resolve this nuisance.\u00a0 At first instance, it was held that the defendants were liable in nuisance, and damages were awarded. \u00a0The defendant\u2019s appealed against this decision to the Court of Appeal.<\/p>\n<h3>Issues<\/h3>\n<p>The first issue was, is a landowner liable in nuisance to their neighbour for a natural hazard occurring on their land which they have failed to address, or are landowners responsible only for man-made hazards?\u00a0 Following this, if a landowner is liable to their neighbour for natural hazards, what is the extent of their liability, and what steps are required to be taken to avoid liability in nuisance for these natural hazards?<\/p>\n<h3>Decision \/ Outcome<\/h3>\n<p>The defendant\u2019s appeal was dismissed, and the Court of Appeal held that landowners are indeed liable for nuisances caused by natural causes such as weathering which occur on their land, and which they have knowledge of, as long as they fail to take reasonable steps to bring this nuisance to an end.<\/p>\n<p>In this case, the defendants had actual knowledge of the nuisance after having been alerted to the danger by the claimants, and they had failed to take any steps whatsoever to abate this nuisance, going so far as to deny their responsibility for it.\u00a0 The duty that lies on a defendant in these circumstances is not necessarily to cure the nuisance (which may be impossible) but to take reasonable steps to end the nuisance.\u00a0 What is reasonable in each case depends on the circumstances, including the defendant\u2019s resources, physical capacity, and the practicality of the remedies which might be required to be applied to bring the nuisance to an end (per Cummings-Bruce LJ at p494).\u00a0 Whilst the defendant\u2019s argued that engaging in remedial matters in this case was impractical, and would result in them incurring unreasonable costs outside of all proportion to the damage done, this was not in issue, as the defendants had in fact failed to take any action at all, and had denied all responsibility when being asked by the claimants to resolve the nuisance.<\/p>\n<p>Criticism of this case can be made in that the rule appears to impose a potentially extremely wide scope of liability on landowners. \u00a0This was a point raised by counsel for the defendants, who also noted that the decision would appear to impose greater liability in nuisance for an omission, or failure to take steps to correct a hazard that was no fault of their own than arose in the analogous law of negligence.\u00a0\u00a0 In other words, the rule imposes liability on those landowners for entirely natural events outside of their control.\u00a0 Unfortunately for landowners however, this has never prevented liability in nuisance according to the rule in <em>Rylands v Fletcher <\/em>(1868) LR 3 HL 330 in which the \u201cstrict liability\u201d of a defendant in nuisance where there has been an accumulation of a hazard on a defendant\u2019s land, and an escape of this thing onto a neighbours land, was established.\u00a0 Applying <em>Rylands v Fletcher <\/em>the same result should logically apply to a defendant who has failed to take steps to arrest a nuisance which has arisen on their land as a result of natural processes.<\/p>\n<p>Furthermore, the defendants are liable only in so far as they fail to take \u201creasonable steps\u201d to resolve the nuisance once they have become aware of it (either actually or constructively).\u00a0 In circumstances in which there is little to be done and in which resolving the nuisance would be impossible, it is necessary only for the defendant to do what is reasonable within their power to resolve this difficulty (but it is not acceptable to do nothing, and deny responsibility for the nuisance entirely).\u00a0 Whilst this might be said to protect the defendant landowner from successful claims in nuisance, the landowner is still required by law to take steps to deal with what would otherwise be regarded as an unfortunate event caused by natural causes.\u00a0 This is all the more so considering the fact that it is no defence for a landowner to argue that the defendant \u201ccame to the nuisance\u201d voluntarily as determined in both <em>Sturges v Bridgman <\/em>(1879) 11 Ch D 852 (CA)and in <em>Miller v Jackson <\/em>[1977] 3 WLR 20 (CA).\u00a0 Given this, it is difficult for landowners to avoid liability in these circumstances, and the law might be argued to be aligned too far in the favour of the landowner\u2019s neighbours who are likely to succeed in nuisance.<\/p>\n<p>Regardless of these arguments, the rule determined in <em>Leakey <\/em>can be regarded, in summary as providing that a defendant landowner is liable for nuisance caused by natural causes on their land as long as they either knew, or ought to have known of the hazard, and that they then failed to take reasonable steps in the circumstances to bring the nuisance to an end.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The claimant built two houses at the foot of a large hill on the defendant\u2019s land.\u00a0 Over a long period of time, soil and rubble had continuously, but slowly, fallen from the mound onto the claimant\u2019s properties, and onto their land, as a result of the natural process of erosion.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[85],"class_list":["post-387","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cases","tag-uk-law"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.6 (Yoast SEO v26.6) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Leakey v National Trust | LawTeacher.net<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The claimant built two houses at the foot of a large hill on the defendant\u2019s land.\u00a0 Over a long period of time, soil and rubble had continuously, but slowly, fallen from the mound onto the claimant\u2019s properties, and onto their land, as a result of the natural process of erosion.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/cases\/leakey-v-national-trust.php\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Leakey v National Trust\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The claimant built two houses at the foot of a large hill on the defendant\u2019s land.\u00a0 Over a long period of time, soil and rubble had continuously, but slowly, fallen from the mound onto the claimant\u2019s properties, and onto their land, as a result of the natural process of erosion.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/cases\/leakey-v-national-trust.php\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"LawTeacher.net\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LawTeacherNet\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LawTeacherNet\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"-0001-11-30T00:00:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/LT-large-logo.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1080\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"LawTeacher\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@LawTeacherNet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@LawTeacherNet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"LawTeacher\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"ScholarlyArticle\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/cases\/leakey-v-national-trust.php#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/cases\/leakey-v-national-trust.php\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"LawTeacher\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#\/schema\/person\/b99962c073c877c4ab8ee3d2486cd56e\"},\"headline\":\"Leakey v National Trust\",\"datePublished\":\"-0001-11-30T00:00:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/cases\/leakey-v-national-trust.php\"},\"wordCount\":1007,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"UK Law\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Case Summaries\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/cases\/leakey-v-national-trust.php\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/cases\/leakey-v-national-trust.php\",\"name\":\"Leakey v National Trust | LawTeacher.net\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"-0001-11-30T00:00:00+00:00\",\"description\":\"The claimant built two houses at the foot of a large hill on the defendant\u2019s land.\u00a0 Over a long period of time, soil and rubble had continuously, but slowly, fallen from the mound onto the claimant\u2019s properties, and onto their land, as a result of the natural process of erosion.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/cases\/leakey-v-national-trust.php#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/cases\/leakey-v-national-trust.php\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/cases\/leakey-v-national-trust.php#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Leakey v National Trust\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/\",\"name\":\"Law Teacher\",\"description\":\"The Law Essay Professionals\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"LawTeacher.net\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Law Teacher\",\"alternateName\":\"LawTeacher.net\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/LT-logo.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/LT-logo.jpg\",\"width\":250,\"height\":250,\"caption\":\"Law Teacher\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LawTeacherNet\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/LawTeacherNet\",\"https:\/\/api.whatsapp.com\/send\/?phone=447723491966&text&type=phone_number&app_absent=0\"],\"description\":\"Law Teacher provides academic writing services for law students throughout the world.\",\"email\":\"contact@lawteacher.net\",\"telephone\":\"+44 115 966 7966\",\"numberOfEmployees\":{\"@type\":\"QuantitativeValue\",\"minValue\":\"51\",\"maxValue\":\"200\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#\/schema\/person\/b99962c073c877c4ab8ee3d2486cd56e\",\"name\":\"LawTeacher\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4fdfab0a9ef25209f111018ecc8a983e19e57c5066a9277217a119582ccbeed3?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4fdfab0a9ef25209f111018ecc8a983e19e57c5066a9277217a119582ccbeed3?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"LawTeacher\"},\"description\":\"LawTeacher.net is the UK's leading provider of academic legal support, offering both writing services and an extensive collection of law study resources for students in the UK and overseas. Founded in 2003 by Grey's Inn graduate Barclay Littlewood, the Company was built on a commitment to excellence, with unique guarantees and a high standard of service from day one. The team includes over 500 UK legally qualified writing experts, with many practising solicitors and barristers, and several former lecturers.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\",\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LawTeacherNet\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/LawTeacherNet\",\"https:\/\/gravatar.com\/lawteacherprofile\"],\"knowsAbout\":[\"Contract Law\",\"Criminal Law\",\"Constitutional and Administrative Law\",\"EU Law\",\"Tort Law\",\"Property Law\",\"Equity and Trusts\",\"Jurisprudence\",\"Company Law\",\"Commercial Law\",\"Family Law\",\"Human Rights Law\",\"Employment Law\",\"Evidence\",\"Public International Law\",\"Legal Research and Methods\",\"Dispute Resolution\",\"Business Law and Practice\",\"Civil Litigation\",\"Criminal Litigation\",\"Professional Conduct\",\"Taxation\",\"Wills and Administration of Estates\",\"Solicitors\u2019 Accounts\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/author\/lawteacher\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Leakey v National Trust | LawTeacher.net","description":"The claimant built two houses at the foot of a large hill on the defendant\u2019s land.\u00a0 Over a long period of time, soil and rubble had continuously, but slowly, fallen from the mound onto the claimant\u2019s properties, and onto their land, as a result of the natural process of erosion.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/cases\/leakey-v-national-trust.php","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Leakey v National Trust","og_description":"The claimant built two houses at the foot of a large hill on the defendant\u2019s land.\u00a0 Over a long period of time, soil and rubble had continuously, but slowly, fallen from the mound onto the claimant\u2019s properties, and onto their land, as a result of the natural process of erosion.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/cases\/leakey-v-national-trust.php","og_site_name":"LawTeacher.net","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LawTeacherNet\/","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LawTeacherNet","article_published_time":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1080,"url":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/LT-large-logo.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"LawTeacher","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@LawTeacherNet","twitter_site":"@LawTeacherNet","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"LawTeacher","Estimated reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"ScholarlyArticle","@id":"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/cases\/leakey-v-national-trust.php#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/cases\/leakey-v-national-trust.php"},"author":{"name":"LawTeacher","@id":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#\/schema\/person\/b99962c073c877c4ab8ee3d2486cd56e"},"headline":"Leakey v National Trust","datePublished":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/cases\/leakey-v-national-trust.php"},"wordCount":1007,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#organization"},"keywords":["UK Law"],"articleSection":["Case Summaries"],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/cases\/leakey-v-national-trust.php","url":"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/cases\/leakey-v-national-trust.php","name":"Leakey v National Trust | LawTeacher.net","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#website"},"datePublished":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00+00:00","description":"The claimant built two houses at the foot of a large hill on the defendant\u2019s land.\u00a0 Over a long period of time, soil and rubble had continuously, but slowly, fallen from the mound onto the claimant\u2019s properties, and onto their land, as a result of the natural process of erosion.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/cases\/leakey-v-national-trust.php#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/cases\/leakey-v-national-trust.php"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/cases\/leakey-v-national-trust.php#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Leakey v National Trust"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#website","url":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/","name":"Law Teacher","description":"The Law Essay Professionals","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#organization"},"alternateName":"LawTeacher.net","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#organization","name":"Law Teacher","alternateName":"LawTeacher.net","url":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/LT-logo.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/LT-logo.jpg","width":250,"height":250,"caption":"Law Teacher"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LawTeacherNet\/","https:\/\/x.com\/LawTeacherNet","https:\/\/api.whatsapp.com\/send\/?phone=447723491966&text&type=phone_number&app_absent=0"],"description":"Law Teacher provides academic writing services for law students throughout the world.","email":"contact@lawteacher.net","telephone":"+44 115 966 7966","numberOfEmployees":{"@type":"QuantitativeValue","minValue":"51","maxValue":"200"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#\/schema\/person\/b99962c073c877c4ab8ee3d2486cd56e","name":"LawTeacher","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4fdfab0a9ef25209f111018ecc8a983e19e57c5066a9277217a119582ccbeed3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4fdfab0a9ef25209f111018ecc8a983e19e57c5066a9277217a119582ccbeed3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"LawTeacher"},"description":"LawTeacher.net is the UK's leading provider of academic legal support, offering both writing services and an extensive collection of law study resources for students in the UK and overseas. Founded in 2003 by Grey's Inn graduate Barclay Littlewood, the Company was built on a commitment to excellence, with unique guarantees and a high standard of service from day one. The team includes over 500 UK legally qualified writing experts, with many practising solicitors and barristers, and several former lecturers.","sameAs":["https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net","https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LawTeacherNet","https:\/\/x.com\/LawTeacherNet","https:\/\/gravatar.com\/lawteacherprofile"],"knowsAbout":["Contract Law","Criminal Law","Constitutional and Administrative Law","EU Law","Tort Law","Property Law","Equity and Trusts","Jurisprudence","Company Law","Commercial Law","Family Law","Human Rights Law","Employment Law","Evidence","Public International Law","Legal Research and Methods","Dispute Resolution","Business Law and Practice","Civil Litigation","Criminal Litigation","Professional Conduct","Taxation","Wills and Administration of Estates","Solicitors\u2019 Accounts"],"url":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/author\/lawteacher"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/387","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=387"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/387\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=387"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=387"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=387"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}