{"id":2551,"date":"2018-02-02T08:40:47","date_gmt":"2018-02-02T08:40:47","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2019-07-16T12:12:01","modified_gmt":"2019-07-16T12:12:01","slug":"property-law-1-land-law-law-essays","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/free-law-essays\/land-law\/property-law-1-land-law-law-essays.php","title":{"rendered":"Property Law 1 (Land Law)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!--Content starts here!--><\/p>\n<p>Land law has and always will be of great importance to people, for a start; we all need somewhere to live. Whether it is freehold property or a leasehold property, we need to know our rights, our boundaries and the regulations and laws that govern us. That is why, even though land law has its roots deep in ancient times of old , it is still of huge importance in today\u2019s ever expanding modepizza buffet rn world. To begin , like the start of any law assignment , we will start with defining land. Defining land is not as straight forward as one might hope, for there is no single authorative , statutory definition . However a good starting point is the partial definition of \u201cland&#8221; in the Law of Property Act 1925 (LPA 1925 ) S.205 (1) (ix) ;<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>\u201cLand includes any of tenure , and mines and minerals, whether or not held apart from the surface , buildings or parts of buildings(whether the division is horizontal , vertical or made in any other way&#8230;&#8221;\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn1\" name=\"bodyftn1\">1<\/a>]<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The definition in this statute leaves a lot to be desired , for a start it is only a partial definition. It begins ; \u201cLand includes&#8221; and what this means is land may include things that are not mentioned in this definition.<\/p>\n<p>Land its definition and the question ;how deep do our property rights extend ? have all attracted debates and theories from many schools of thought . it is very central to the latin maxim; \u201c cuius est solum eius est usque ad coleum et ad inferos neccesam&#8221; which is usually translated in English to have the following meaning; \u201c the rights of the surface owner extend upwards to the heavens and downward toward the center of the earth&#8221; This was cited in the case of Corbett V Hill\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn2\" name=\"bodyftn2\">2<\/a>]<\/span>\u00a0. One must realise that the aged Latin maxim hardly helps with the definition of land and to what we own .In our modern society , would it actually be possible to own up to the heavens and to the center of the earth?<\/p>\n<p>In John G Spranklings \u201cowning the centre of the earth&#8221;\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn3\" name=\"bodyftn3\">3<\/a>]<\/span>\u00a0he recognises that because there has been such an advancement with our scientific technology as well as environmental changes such as global warming there is a need for us to recognise the need for a new \u201cmodel&#8221; of subsurface ownership and in this article\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn4\" name=\"bodyftn4\">4<\/a>]<\/span>\u00a0he proposes and critically evaluates four alternative approaches to subsurface property rights. He argues that the owners rights should extend only 1000 feet below the surface , with an obvious exception to mineral (and treasure) rights . he understands that no human has penetrated below the crust . He states that \u201c no case holding; or statute resolves the question;and the center of the earth theory of subsurface rights is mere hyperbole\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn5\" name=\"bodyftn5\">5<\/a>]<\/span>\u00a0&#8221; . determing and coming to an understanding of where our rights extend is based on scientific and logical theories rather than legal ones. He concludes that \u201c given our modern and scientific knowledge and new advances in subsurface technology , we must now confront the equally foolish notion that the subsurface owner holds title to the center of the earth&#8221; he goes on to say \u201c&#8230;lacking in either law or logic, the center of the earth approach is merely a curious relic from bygone age&#8221;\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn6\" name=\"bodyftn6\">6<\/a>]<\/span>\u00a0it is well established via scholars like Sprankling and Gray as well as case law that the latin maxim is outdated , its non consistent and the need for developments in the law is evidential ,Britain is seen as quite a \u201ctraditionalist \u201c country , the judge to set precedent for the development for departure from the maxim will have to be not only brave but in an essence , radical.<\/p>\n<p>When we take in to account of other scholars work, for example grey , on the subject of \u201c air space&#8221; as opposed to Sprankling was mainly on the rights below the ground and to where they should extend we see that they are supportive in one anothers views of disembarking from the&#8221;solem&#8221; approach.the subject is tackled by intellect , logical reasoning , the extensive knowledge of how our modern world is and what is available to us at a whim.<\/p>\n<p>Kevin Grey states in Property in thin air\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn7\" name=\"bodyftn7\">7<\/a>]<\/span>\u00a0on page two of his journal that ;&#8221; whatever the maxim cuius est solum &#8230;. to the common lawyer of earlier centuries it has since become obvious that its legal meaning is now heavily qualified by the advent of more recent technologies \u201c he acknowledges like Sprankling the lack of knowledge in Blackstones era in regards of geology also that science and technology has progressed to a level so advanced , Grey recognises that which , although it is hard to determine land in the modern world we need to take a logical and clear approach. Grey notes that for legal purposes there must be a clear distinction between the upper and lower stratums of airspace although it is agreed that the maxim cuius est solum &#8230; has no relevance at all to the Higher of the strata and if the \u201cusque as coelum&#8221; was to be taken seriously\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn8\" name=\"bodyftn8\">8<\/a>]<\/span>\u00a0it has now been restricted to landowners rights over airspace are clearly restricted to the&#8221;lower sratum&#8221; which is basically the immediate superadjacent airspace which the landowner can reasonably enjoy and have a purpose for the use of his land at ground level. As Justice Douglas once said in the United States Supreme Court\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn9\" name=\"bodyftn9\">9<\/a>]<\/span>\u00a0, the landowner must have \u201c exclusive control of the immediate reaches of the enveloping atmosphere&#8221; since otherwise \u201c buildings could not be erected , trees could not be planted , and even fences could not be run&#8221; . Grey further acknowledges that that upper stratum does not belong to anyone but the world he says it falls into the category of res omnium communis\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn10\" name=\"bodyftn10\">10<\/a>]<\/span>\u00a0(space as the common heritage of mankind) .Although with regards to the boundary between the upper and lower stratum and where it begins and ends this has never been fixed. Although there is a range of cases and laws along with a bit of logical thinking from scholars which make it a bit clear to us. In most cases the lower stratum is unlikely to reach beyond an altitude of 200metres above the roof of a house, flat building etc . if it were to do otherwise this would result in in an action for trespass by every plane which passes over a suburban garden\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn11\" name=\"bodyftn11\">11<\/a>]<\/span>\u00a0and i suppose in regard to the \u201cfloodgates arguements&#8221; for claims it is more beneficial to have a plain recognition in common law\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn12\" name=\"bodyftn12\">12<\/a>]<\/span>\u00a0and in modern legislation such as the Civil Aviation act\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn13\" name=\"bodyftn13\">13<\/a>]<\/span>\u00a0where it states that in Britain, no aircraft may ever fly \u201c closer than 1500 feet to any person, vessel, vehicle or structure&#8221;\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn14\" name=\"bodyftn14\">14<\/a>]<\/span>\u00a0although an exception is made for aircraft \u201cwhile landing or taking off\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn15\" name=\"bodyftn15\">15<\/a>]<\/span>\u00a0and even for gliders \u201c while hill soaring&#8221;\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn16\" name=\"bodyftn16\">16<\/a>]<\/span>\u00a0. We have learnt that from the case of Bernstein of Leigh (Baron) v Skyviews and General Ltd (1978) Q.B. 479 that the higher stratum of airspace is not part of owners property although in certain circumstances like the case of Woolerton and Wilson ltd v Richard Costain ltd (1970) 1 W.L.R. 411, 413D you may base an action in tort for trespass if control of the lower stratum was necessary for owner to have reasonable use and enjoyment of land.<\/p>\n<p>Any intrusion of a landowners property will amount to trespass, this can be seen from the following examples; if the branches of your neighbours tree where to overhang onto your land, you are entitled without giving prior notice\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn17\" name=\"bodyftn17\">17<\/a>]<\/span>\u00a0to chop off the branches which intrude into your airspace\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn18\" name=\"bodyftn18\">18<\/a>]<\/span>\u00a0, so long as you do not enter upon your neighbours land for that purpose\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn19\" name=\"bodyftn19\">19<\/a>]<\/span>\u00a0. Just like it would be trespass by overhanging eaves\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn20\" name=\"bodyftn20\">20<\/a>]<\/span>\u00a0, advertising signs\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn21\" name=\"bodyftn21\">21<\/a>]<\/span>\u00a0and by the jibs of sky cranes\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn22\" name=\"bodyftn22\">22<\/a>]<\/span>\u00a0.<\/p>\n<p>The landowner owns the subterranean space below the surface of their land. He can dig down into it to form a cellar or underground room. As S.205(1)(ix)\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn23\" name=\"bodyftn23\">23<\/a>]<\/span>\u00a0states, Mines and minerals form part of the land , however certain minerals do not belong to the landowner but infact the state. Silver and Gold belong to the Crown as of right ; the Case of Mines\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn24\" name=\"bodyftn24\">24<\/a>]<\/span>\u00a0(1568) ( or R v Earl of Northhumberland). The Crown is also entitled to oil, petroleum , coal and natural gas by statutory right , this can be seen in The Coal Industry Act 1994 and the Petroleum Act 1998. In addition to this , the Crown has the right to treasure found in the land. The law on Treasure is determined within the Treasure Act 1996. It states that items of 2 to 9 coins which are 300 years old and at last ten percent precious metal will be regarded as Treasure. If ten or more coins are part of the same find , they need not be ten percent precious metal. The Treasure Designation Order (2002) extended the Treasure Act 1996 so that any prehistoric base metal object would be regarded as treasure.<\/p>\n<p>Land is therefore three dimensional, there is the surface of the land, the ground beneath the surface of the land and of course the airspace . different people can own different strata (levels) of land.<\/p>\n<p>For example , my parents bought a house in Bedwelty which is built on land above the coalfield there, they will own the surface of the land (and of course the house built upon it) but the land beneath the surface , with the coal in it, may very well be owned by the British Mining Company.<\/p>\n<p>This three d-dimensional extent of land can also be important if land borders a roadway. There is a presumption that the landowner owns the subsoil of the roadway adjoining their land up to the middle of the roadway ; ad medium filum ( to the mid line, as they often say) . Landowners can construct cellars that extend into this space below the ground, like many of the pubs have done in Wind Street with the use of trap doors to enable delivery of barrels to the cellar ( not that I would say to a fellow Law student whilst on a night out; \u201c hasn\u2019t that land owner made marvellous use of their subterean space?&#8221;).<\/p>\n<p>So is it really possible to claim adverse possession of airspace and subterranean space? Firstly a good start would be asking what is adverse possession and what does it entail?<\/p>\n<p>Acquiring land by \u201cAdverse Possession&#8221; is the process by which a person who is not the legal owner (e.g. A squatter) of the land can become the owner\u00a0of the land after occupying it for a defined period of time\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn25\" name=\"bodyftn25\">25<\/a>]<\/span>\u00a0.Dealing first with unregistered land, to acquire title by adverse possession the squatter must show he has had exclusive possession without the consent of the true owner for 12 years. The most common and best evidence for this is that the land has been fenced off so that only the squatter has access to it. Hence it is very difficult to acquire title to paths and roadways, which many people could use. Similarly, for example i have a neighbour who occasionally parks his car on my land , this would not be a ground for a claim of adverse possession.<\/p>\n<p>Obviously for registered land it is slightly different. The Land Registration Act 2002 has reduced the required period to 10 years (the old rules still apply if a person had adverse possession for more than 12 years before the act came into force on Oct 13 2003). But it has made it much more difficult to gain title this way , hence that is why although there are over 20,000,000 registered properties in England and Wales, only just over half of the land mass is registered. Much of this land is rural property in the hands of large institutional landowners such as the Church of England, educational institutions , the Ministry Of Defence and the Crown. Registration of land under the Land Registration Act 2002 affords property owners some protection against squatters as well as avoiding the need to produce old documents each time a property changes hands.<\/p>\n<p>The application for adverse possession will be automatically rejected unless the squatter can make out one of three grounds;factual possession Powell V McFarlane\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn26\" name=\"bodyftn26\">26<\/a>]<\/span>\u00a0, an intention to posses the land and all three criteria has been met for at least 12 years (if the period ends before 13 October 2003) or at least 10 years (if the period ends after 13 October 2003\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn27\" name=\"bodyftn27\">27<\/a>]<\/span>\u00a0).<\/p>\n<p>Lastly, the squatter may have been in adverse possession of land adjacent to their own under the mistaken but reasonable belief it belonged to them. This only applies if the boundary has not been determined by the Land Registry (and it is very rare for it to determine boundaries) and where the land has been registered for more than a year. Most Adverse possession claims arise from this and the &#8220;general boundaries rule&#8221;\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn28\" name=\"bodyftn28\">28<\/a>]<\/span>\u00a0means one cannot rely on Land Registry plans to define a property\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn29\" name=\"bodyftn29\">29<\/a>]<\/span>\u00a0exactly .It is often very difficult to prove from old deeds where the legal boundary is. So if someone can show that his garden fence has been in its current position for at least 10 years, he should be able to acquire title to any land on his side even if the neighbour can show the legal title is theirs.<\/p>\n<p>If we now consider Trespass to land has been recognised as a cause of action in tort for many years. It arises whenever there is an unlawful presence on or interference with another\u2019s land.\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn30\" name=\"bodyftn30\">30<\/a>]<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Unlike an action for nuisance, trespass to land is actionable without proof of damage. Common examples include:<\/p>\n<p>Unlawful entry: The extent of the entry is irrelevant.\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn31\" name=\"bodyftn31\">31<\/a>]<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Invasion of the airspace by an overhanging item or structure\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn32\" name=\"bodyftn32\">32<\/a>]<\/span>\u00a0.<\/p>\n<p>It is accepted that the law protects not only against intrusions onto the surface of land but also against those above and below it. This stems from the dictum \u201ccuius est solum, eius est usque and coelum et ad infernos&#8221; &#8211; whoever owns land owns it all the way up to heaven and down to hell &#8211; that has applied since 1766.<\/p>\n<p>In Bocardo\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn33\" name=\"bodyftn33\">33<\/a>]<\/span>\u00a0, Lord Hope maintained that the phrase \u201cstill has value in English law as encapsulating, in simple language, a proposition of law which has commanded general acceptance.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>In that case, it was determined that possession of land extends to the strata below it, so that the drilling of wells to a depth of around 2,800ft amounted to an actionable trespass Some may have found this decision surprising.\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn34\" name=\"bodyftn34\">34<\/a>]<\/span>\u00a0It may appear that the tort of trespass affords a landowner extensive possession rights, but the law has developed to allow a party to gain access to land belonging to another in certain circumstances\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn35\" name=\"bodyftn35\">35<\/a>]<\/span>\u00a0.<\/p>\n<p>If we consider the recent case of Stadium Capital Holdings ( no2) ltd v St Marylebone Property Company PLC (2009)\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn36\" name=\"bodyftn36\">36<\/a>]<\/span>\u00a0it should be noted that , the court upheld the principle that a freehold owner of land owns both the airspace above the ground and the subsoil and also that it is not possible to aquire title to land by adverse possession if the land is occupied with consent. Therefore i can conclude from this that there should not be any doubt that it is theoretically possible to be in possession of airspace because if real property is capable of ownership it is surely capable of being adversely possessed , subject to the test for actual possession which is adverse to the paper owner and the requisite animus possidendi being met.Subterranean space and airspace can be owned as they are part of the 3 \u2013dimensional take on land; there is the surface of the land, the ground beneath the surface of the land and of course the airspace therefore they can be adversely possessed.<\/p>\n<p>How accurate is the statement ; \u201c now the ordinary rule of law is, that whoever has got the solum-whoever has got the site \u2013is the owner of everything up to the sky and down to the centre of the Earth?\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn37\" name=\"bodyftn37\">37<\/a>]<\/span>\u00a0I think this statement would have been accurate for that period in time but not ours. And why? Simply because of modernisation and greater scientific understanding of geology. The problems that the Latin maxim might give rise to as man\u2019s<\/p>\n<p>understanding of the earth\u2019s structure improved, airspace began to be used for the<\/p>\n<p>passage of aircraft and means were developed to penetrate deep below the<\/p>\n<p>surface were not, of course, obvious in the 19th century and certainly not in the 13th century.<\/p>\n<p>Sprankling, \u201cOwning the Center of the Earth&#8221;\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn38\" name=\"bodyftn38\">38<\/a>]<\/span>\u00a0, points out however that most modern US legal texts continue to endorse the centre of the earth theory and that almost all modern cases continue to embrace it too\u2026Addressing himself to the question, how far below the earth\u2019s surface do property rights extend, he asserts at p 1033\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn39\" name=\"bodyftn39\">39<\/a>]<\/span>\u00a0that the surface owner should certainly hold property rights to a portion of the subsurface. After exploring four alternative models\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn40\" name=\"bodyftn40\">40<\/a>]<\/span>\u00a0he comes down in favour of a specified depth such as 1000 feet, but he acknowledges that reasonable minds may differ as to the appropriate extent. The goal of his article, he said, was to ignite that debate, not to extinguish it: p 1039.<\/p>\n<p>Dr Jean Howell, \u201c\u2018Subterranean Land law\u2019\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn41\" name=\"bodyftn41\">41<\/a>]<\/span>\u00a0acknowledges that it might be argued that the same test as that which GriffithsJ applied\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn42\" name=\"bodyftn42\">42<\/a>]<\/span>\u00a0should be used for land below the surface. But, as she also notes, it was implicit in that case that even above the notional height at which the land owner\u2019s usable rights stop, there is not a free for all in the airspace above. To characterise the surface owner\u2019s rights as following technological advances as to the depth at which land can be exploited, she says, would offend against all notions of \u201cproperty&#8221; whose defining quality in land is certainty. She concludes, at p 285\u00a0<span class=\"essay_footnotecitation\">[<a class=\"essay_footnotecitation_link\" href=\"#ftn43\" name=\"bodyftn43\">43<\/a>]<\/span>\u00a0, that any intrusion into land which is not sanctioned by some countervailing property right will be a trespass and that, although the surface owner will not usually wish to or be able to utilise the ground below the surface, he has rights in the land which could be valuable. Although scholars, case law and academics alike try to define a scope of where our property rights begin and end in reference to airspace and subterranean space the slightly outdated but relevant latin maxim will remain a part of our law today. The british courts seem reluctanct to let go of what seems to be quite a traditional maxim , the courts are well known for being very conservative and they seem to avoid doing anything radical or perhaps that although its validity could be questioned due to our modern society perhaps its importance and acceptance of the maxim simply cannot be questioned.<\/p>\n<p>In Bocardo SA v Star Energy Onshore Ltd [2010] UKSC 35; [2010] 3 WLR 654, Lord Hope maintained that the phrase \u201cstill has value in English law as encapsulating, in simple language, a proposition of law which has commanded general acceptance.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><!-- Content ends here --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Land law has and always will be of great importance to people, for a start; we all need somewhere to live. Whether it is freehold property&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16],"tags":[85],"class_list":["post-2551","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-free-law-essaysland-law","tag-uk-law"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.6 (Yoast SEO v26.6) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Property Law 1 (Land Law) | LawTeacher.net<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Land law has and always will be of great importance to people, for a start; we all need somewhere to live. Whether it is freehold property...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/free-law-essays\/land-law\/property-law-1-land-law-law-essays.php\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Property Law 1 (Land Law)\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Land law has and always will be of great importance to people, for a start; we all need somewhere to live. Whether it is freehold property...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/free-law-essays\/land-law\/property-law-1-land-law-law-essays.php\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"LawTeacher.net\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LawTeacherNet\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LawTeacherNet\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"-0001-11-30T00:00:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/LT-large-logo.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1080\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"LawTeacher\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@LawTeacherNet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@LawTeacherNet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"LawTeacher\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"16 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"ScholarlyArticle\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/free-law-essays\/land-law\/property-law-1-land-law-law-essays.php#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/free-law-essays\/land-law\/property-law-1-land-law-law-essays.php\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"LawTeacher\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#\/schema\/person\/b99962c073c877c4ab8ee3d2486cd56e\"},\"headline\":\"Property Law 1 (Land Law)\",\"datePublished\":\"-0001-11-30T00:00:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/free-law-essays\/land-law\/property-law-1-land-law-law-essays.php\"},\"wordCount\":3116,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"UK Law\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Land Law\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/free-law-essays\/land-law\/property-law-1-land-law-law-essays.php\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/free-law-essays\/land-law\/property-law-1-land-law-law-essays.php\",\"name\":\"Property Law 1 (Land Law) | LawTeacher.net\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"-0001-11-30T00:00:00+00:00\",\"description\":\"Land law has and always will be of great importance to people, for a start; we all need somewhere to live. Whether it is freehold property...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/free-law-essays\/land-law\/property-law-1-land-law-law-essays.php#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/free-law-essays\/land-law\/property-law-1-land-law-law-essays.php\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/free-law-essays\/land-law\/property-law-1-land-law-law-essays.php#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Property Law 1 (Land Law)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/\",\"name\":\"Law Teacher\",\"description\":\"The Law Essay Professionals\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"LawTeacher.net\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Law Teacher\",\"alternateName\":\"LawTeacher.net\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/LT-logo.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/LT-logo.jpg\",\"width\":250,\"height\":250,\"caption\":\"Law Teacher\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LawTeacherNet\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/LawTeacherNet\",\"https:\/\/api.whatsapp.com\/send\/?phone=447723491966&text&type=phone_number&app_absent=0\"],\"description\":\"Law Teacher provides academic writing services for law students throughout the world.\",\"email\":\"contact@lawteacher.net\",\"telephone\":\"+44 115 966 7966\",\"numberOfEmployees\":{\"@type\":\"QuantitativeValue\",\"minValue\":\"51\",\"maxValue\":\"200\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#\/schema\/person\/b99962c073c877c4ab8ee3d2486cd56e\",\"name\":\"LawTeacher\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4fdfab0a9ef25209f111018ecc8a983e19e57c5066a9277217a119582ccbeed3?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4fdfab0a9ef25209f111018ecc8a983e19e57c5066a9277217a119582ccbeed3?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"LawTeacher\"},\"description\":\"LawTeacher.net is the UK's leading provider of academic legal support, offering both writing services and an extensive collection of law study resources for students in the UK and overseas. Founded in 2003 by Grey's Inn graduate Barclay Littlewood, the Company was built on a commitment to excellence, with unique guarantees and a high standard of service from day one. The team includes over 500 UK legally qualified writing experts, with many practising solicitors and barristers, and several former lecturers.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\",\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LawTeacherNet\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/LawTeacherNet\",\"https:\/\/gravatar.com\/lawteacherprofile\"],\"knowsAbout\":[\"Contract Law\",\"Criminal Law\",\"Constitutional and Administrative Law\",\"EU Law\",\"Tort Law\",\"Property Law\",\"Equity and Trusts\",\"Jurisprudence\",\"Company Law\",\"Commercial Law\",\"Family Law\",\"Human Rights Law\",\"Employment Law\",\"Evidence\",\"Public International Law\",\"Legal Research and Methods\",\"Dispute Resolution\",\"Business Law and Practice\",\"Civil Litigation\",\"Criminal Litigation\",\"Professional Conduct\",\"Taxation\",\"Wills and Administration of Estates\",\"Solicitors\u2019 Accounts\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/author\/lawteacher\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Property Law 1 (Land Law) | LawTeacher.net","description":"Land law has and always will be of great importance to people, for a start; we all need somewhere to live. Whether it is freehold property...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/free-law-essays\/land-law\/property-law-1-land-law-law-essays.php","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Property Law 1 (Land Law)","og_description":"Land law has and always will be of great importance to people, for a start; we all need somewhere to live. Whether it is freehold property...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/free-law-essays\/land-law\/property-law-1-land-law-law-essays.php","og_site_name":"LawTeacher.net","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LawTeacherNet\/","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LawTeacherNet","article_published_time":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1080,"url":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/LT-large-logo.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"LawTeacher","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@LawTeacherNet","twitter_site":"@LawTeacherNet","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"LawTeacher","Estimated reading time":"16 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"ScholarlyArticle","@id":"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/free-law-essays\/land-law\/property-law-1-land-law-law-essays.php#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/free-law-essays\/land-law\/property-law-1-land-law-law-essays.php"},"author":{"name":"LawTeacher","@id":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#\/schema\/person\/b99962c073c877c4ab8ee3d2486cd56e"},"headline":"Property Law 1 (Land Law)","datePublished":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/free-law-essays\/land-law\/property-law-1-land-law-law-essays.php"},"wordCount":3116,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#organization"},"keywords":["UK Law"],"articleSection":["Land Law"],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/free-law-essays\/land-law\/property-law-1-land-law-law-essays.php","url":"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/free-law-essays\/land-law\/property-law-1-land-law-law-essays.php","name":"Property Law 1 (Land Law) | LawTeacher.net","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#website"},"datePublished":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00+00:00","description":"Land law has and always will be of great importance to people, for a start; we all need somewhere to live. Whether it is freehold property...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/free-law-essays\/land-law\/property-law-1-land-law-law-essays.php#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/free-law-essays\/land-law\/property-law-1-land-law-law-essays.php"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/free-law-essays\/land-law\/property-law-1-land-law-law-essays.php#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Property Law 1 (Land Law)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#website","url":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/","name":"Law Teacher","description":"The Law Essay Professionals","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#organization"},"alternateName":"LawTeacher.net","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#organization","name":"Law Teacher","alternateName":"LawTeacher.net","url":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/LT-logo.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/LT-logo.jpg","width":250,"height":250,"caption":"Law Teacher"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LawTeacherNet\/","https:\/\/x.com\/LawTeacherNet","https:\/\/api.whatsapp.com\/send\/?phone=447723491966&text&type=phone_number&app_absent=0"],"description":"Law Teacher provides academic writing services for law students throughout the world.","email":"contact@lawteacher.net","telephone":"+44 115 966 7966","numberOfEmployees":{"@type":"QuantitativeValue","minValue":"51","maxValue":"200"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#\/schema\/person\/b99962c073c877c4ab8ee3d2486cd56e","name":"LawTeacher","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4fdfab0a9ef25209f111018ecc8a983e19e57c5066a9277217a119582ccbeed3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4fdfab0a9ef25209f111018ecc8a983e19e57c5066a9277217a119582ccbeed3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"LawTeacher"},"description":"LawTeacher.net is the UK's leading provider of academic legal support, offering both writing services and an extensive collection of law study resources for students in the UK and overseas. Founded in 2003 by Grey's Inn graduate Barclay Littlewood, the Company was built on a commitment to excellence, with unique guarantees and a high standard of service from day one. The team includes over 500 UK legally qualified writing experts, with many practising solicitors and barristers, and several former lecturers.","sameAs":["https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net","https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LawTeacherNet","https:\/\/x.com\/LawTeacherNet","https:\/\/gravatar.com\/lawteacherprofile"],"knowsAbout":["Contract Law","Criminal Law","Constitutional and Administrative Law","EU Law","Tort Law","Property Law","Equity and Trusts","Jurisprudence","Company Law","Commercial Law","Family Law","Human Rights Law","Employment Law","Evidence","Public International Law","Legal Research and Methods","Dispute Resolution","Business Law and Practice","Civil Litigation","Criminal Litigation","Professional Conduct","Taxation","Wills and Administration of Estates","Solicitors\u2019 Accounts"],"url":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/author\/lawteacher"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2551","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2551"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2551\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2551"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2551"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2551"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}