{"id":1883,"date":"2018-02-02T08:40:47","date_gmt":"2018-02-02T08:40:47","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2019-07-03T19:11:23","modified_gmt":"2019-07-03T19:11:23","slug":"human-rights-law-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/free-law-essays\/general-law\/human-rights-law-2.php","title":{"rendered":"Human Rights Essays"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Private life,  in the Court&#8217;s view, includes a person&#8217;s physical and psychological integrity;  the guarantee afforded by article 8 of the Convention is primarily intended to  ensure the development, without outside interference, of the personality of  each individual in his relations with other human beings.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>While the essential object of Article 8 is to protect the individual  against arbitrary interference by the public authorities, it does not merely  compel the State to abstain from such interference: in addition to this  negative undertaking, there may be positive obligations inherent in effective  respect for private or family life.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>These  obligations by involve the adoption of measures designed to secure respect for  private life even in the sphere of the relations of individuals between  themselves. However, the concept of respect is not precisely defined. In order  to determine whether such obligations exist, regard must be had to the fair  balance that has to be struck between the general interest and the interests of  the individual, while the State has, in any event, a margin of apreciation  (Botta v. Italy, European Court of Human Rights). <\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Appraise the case law on  Article 8 ECHR under the HRA 1998 for compliance with these standards&#8217;.<\/strong><\/p>\n<h3>I.  Introduction<\/h3>\n<p>The protection  of the human rights has been a priority for the European Community since its  creation. For this reason the provisions that are related with the so-called  &#8216;freedoms&#8217; of the person are characterised as fundamental ones. However, there  are times that personal &#8216;rights&#8217; are violated and the efforts for their  restoration &#8211; through the procedures that have been developed for this purpose  &#8211; end to failure. One of the most important rights of this category is that of  private life the protection of which has been delegated to the authorised  European and national Courts by the application of the provisions included in  the article 8 ECHR. In UK, the Courts use the above article combined with the  provisions included in the British legislation and mainly the Human Rights Act  of 1998, to protect the private life as a basic personal right examining in  each case the fulfilment of the requirements that are contained in the relevant  legislation.<\/p>\n<h3>II.The right  of &#8216;private life&#8217; under the view of the European Convention of Human Rights &#8211;  article 8 &#8211; and the Human Rigts Act of 1998 &#8211; definition and content<\/h3>\n<p>Article 8 of  ECHR does not include a clear definition of &#8216;private life&#8217;. It just describes the possible  parameters of the right avoiding to include a detailed description of it. More  specifically he refers &#8211; as an example &#8211; to the &#8216;family life, home and corespondance&#8217;. Of course  there could be the opinion that the &#8216;private life&#8217; as mentioned in the above  article has a particular explanation &#8211; which is not included &#8211; ane that the  elements which follow it, i.e. &#8216;family life&#8217;, &#8216;home&#8217; and &#8216;correspondence&#8217;, have  their own meaning and are separate rights that can enforce their respect.  However, from the next paragraph (2) we can assume that the aspects of a  person&#8217;s life as described in paragraph (1) constitute a &#8216;single&#8217; right that  could be summarized in the phrase &#8216;private life&#8217;. More specifically, the law  refers to &#8216;the exercise of this right&#8217; defining in this way that the  right protected by this provision is one, that of the private life.<\/p>\n<p>As for the  application of this right in the UK, the existing Human Rights Act of 1998  (which has as a main task the activation and the protection of the rights  included in the ECHR) secures the recognition of the above right and creates  the environment that will promote its application in the everyday&#8217;s activities.  The HRA contains specific provisions for the interpretation of all the  Convention rights (including the right of &#8216;private life&#8217;) as well as for the  participation and the power of the authorities to supervise and to enforce its  application. The above Act does not modify the existing rights (as included in  the ECHR) but it simply specifies the role and the extension of power of the  authorities regarding the application and the protection of these provisions.<\/p>\n<h3>III. Problems  arising during the application of the existing legislation (8 ECHR) by the Courts  with the use of HRA 1998 &#8211; compliance with standards<\/h3>\n<p>Altough the  provision related with the respect of the private life is well known and has  been applied for a long time, the area and the circumstances of its application  are still in question and there are times that the violation of the right is not clearly  recognized  &#8211; or even is disregarded &#8211; because of the simultaneous existence of a relevant  public right which has the priority of application under all the circumstances.  The structure of the provision of article 8 of ECHR can create by itself a lot  of problems regarding the respect of the right. Although in the 1<sup>st<\/sup> paragraph the prohibition of the violation of the right is clearly stated, the  2<sup>nd<\/sup> paragraph specifies a number of aims the pursuit of which can  justify interference with article 8 rights, as par example the &#8216;economic  well-being of the country&#8217; or &#8216;the protection of the rights and freedoms of  others&#8217;. Towards that direction it was decided by the court (Wood v United  Kingdom) that the covert surveillance measures which the police had applied in  the case of Clayton Wood, constituted an interference which was not in  accordance with the law and that there was no effective remedy (Privacy and  Data Protection, 2004). A. Rowley (2005) examines a very important issue  regarding the respect of &#8216;private life&#8217; as it is stated in the ECHR, this of  the anti-social behaviour orders. The problem in the specific occasion is the  publicity that follows the orders and which is justified by the UK law (see  also Guidance on Publishing Anti Social Behaviour Orders, 1\/3\/2005). The  publicity of ASBOs is considered by A. Rowley as a very &#8216;sensitive&#8217; matter  (regarding the risk of violation of article 8 ECHR) and as a measure it is  suggested that such a decicion should be first examined for its necessity, its  structure and its benefits both for the public and the perpetrator. We should  notice that here that the &#8216;sacrifice&#8217; of the personal right in favour of the public  one that is taken place in such an occasion, cannot be accepted as totally  justified. Of course there are cases where this &#8216;violation&#8217; could be considered  as absolutely necessary (when the &#8216;dangerous&#8217; and &#8216;violent&#8217; behaviour of a  person is totally proved) but even then the evidence used for such an  assumption has to be examined thoroughly for its validity and the measures  taken have to be in accordance with the desired target.<\/p>\n<p>Another issue  that is very connected with the respect of the private life is that of the  application of extradition as it can be considered in relation with the general  rights of the natives of a state under the national and international rules.  For the specific legislative piece, the European Convention, extradition can be  regarded as opposite to its provisions especially the one of article 8. On the  other hand article 8 &#8211; in a case of this nature &#8211; places an obligation upon the  state&#8217;s authorities that if they aren&#8217;t willing to prosecute, then the burden  is on them to justify their decision (see also The Lawyer, 2004, 19)<\/p>\n<p>A very common  violation of the right to &#8216;private life&#8217; occurs regarding the gathering,  keeping and distribution of personal data. These data can refer to many aspects  of the personal life, from leizure time to medical treatments. The way that  most of the enterprises are structured and operate can justify the collection  of different types of data at a first stage.  However, when the reason of their existence has vanished, they should be  destroyed mostly for safety reasons. This is a rare phenomenon and in most  cases the data that have obtained from one person (sometimes even without his  knowledge) are kept  and may be used anytime in accordance with the intentions of the holder.<\/p>\n<p>The right for  &#8216;private life&#8217; is used extensively relating the disputes between the State and  the foreigners. The use of article 8 of ECHR is usually combined here with the  article 14 of ECHR (prohibition of discrimination). The use of the provisions  of the ECHR is seen as a &#8216;vehicle&#8217; for a positive result in cases that there  are no alternatives legal arguments that could be used successfully (see also  Chichester District Council v First Secretary of State and others, 2004 and R &#8211;  on the application of Mehmeti &#8211; v the Secretary of State for the Home  Department).<\/p>\n<h3>IV.  Conclusion<\/h3>\n<p>From the above  mentioned we could come to the conclusion that the right of &#8216;private life&#8217; is  not limited to a particular aspect of person&#8217;s life. It may be found associated  with a variety of human activities  depending on the social position and the culture of the specific person.  However, this does not mean that its usage is permitted under all the circumstances  of the daily activities. Moreover, even in the conditions that its application  would appear as necessary its violation is sometimes unavoidable. In these  cases, the decision for the existence or not of breach of the right belongs to  the Courts (the European and the National Ones), which have to apply the  relevant legislation after the careful examination of the evidence and only in  cases, that the violation of the right can be strongly assumed. However, we  should notice that the above decision if often difficult to be taken mainly  because of the extremely fine borders that separate the personal rights from  the public ones.<\/p>\n<h3>References<\/h3>\n<p><strong>A. Journals<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Bailey &#8211; Harris,  R., (2004), &#8216;Case Report: Human Rights&#8217;, Family Law, 34 (639)<\/li>\n<li>Davey, R.,  (2005), &#8216;Practice Points: Injecting Some Caution Into Drug Testing&#8217;, Law  Society Gazette, 102.2 (33)<\/li>\n<li>Fletcher, G. P.,  (2005), &#8216;Articles &#8211; Parochial Versus Universal Criminal Law&#8217;, Journal of  International Criminal Justice, 3.1 (20)<\/li>\n<li>International  Journal of Evidence and Proof, &#8216;Noticeboard &#8211; Retention of DNA Samples After  Acquittal &#8211; United Kingdom (England)&#8217;, Jan2005, 9 (55)<\/li>\n<li>Johnston, C.,  Kaye, J., (2004), &#8216;Does the UK Biobank have a legal obligation to feedback  individual findings to participants?&#8217;, Medical Law Review, 2004.12 (239)<\/li>\n<li>Law Society  Gazette, &#8216;Legal Update: Law Reports&#8217;, Oct2004, 101.40 (28)<\/li>\n<li>Layard, A.,  (2004), &#8216;Human Rights in the balance &#8211; Hatton and Marcic&#8217;, Environmental Law  Review, 6.3 (196)<\/li>\n<li>Medical Law  Review, &#8216;United Kingdom &#8211; The right to Require Life &#8211; Prolonging Treatment&#8217;,  Sep2004, 12 (306)<\/li>\n<li>Mitchell, E.,  (2005), &#8216;Tackling anti-social behaviour&#8217;, New Law Journal, 155.7164 (250)<\/li>\n<li>Rowley, A.,  (2005), &#8216;Named and Shamed&#8217;, New Law Journal, 155.7170 (481)<\/li>\n<li>O&#8217;Ferrall, G.  M., (2005), &#8216;Ancillary Relief, Equitable Interests and Criminal Confiscation  Orders&#8217;, Family Law, 35 (227)<\/li>\n<li>Prest, C.,  (2005), &#8216;The right to respect for family life: obligations of the State in  private law children cases&#8217;, Family Law, 35 (124)<\/li>\n<li>Privacy and Data  Protection, &#8216;Police Bugging &#8211; Unlawful&#8217;, Dec2004, 5.2 (1)<\/li>\n<li>The Lawyer,  &#8216;Analysis: Home or away&#8217;, October 11, 2004, p. 19<\/li>\n<li>Wenderoth, A.,  (2004), &#8216;Private lives in the public eye &#8211; recent developments in the law of  Privacy&#8217;, Privacy and Data Protection, 4.8 (10)<\/li>\n<li>Wicks, E.,  (2004), &#8216;Late Termination of Pregnancy for foetal abnormality: medical and  legal perspectives&#8217;, Medical Law Review, 2004.12 (285)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>B. Cases<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Andrews v  Reading Borough Council, 7\/2\/2005, Queen&#8217;s Bench Division<\/li>\n<li>Chichester  District Council v First Secretary of State and others, 29 September 2004,  Court of Appeal (Civil Division)<\/li>\n<li>Commission of  the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium, 19 September 202, Court of  Justice of the European Communities<\/li>\n<li>Dow Chemical  Iberica, SA and others v Commission of the European Communities, joined cases  97\/87, 98\/87 and 99\/87, Court of Justice of the European Communities<\/li>\n<li>E v Director of  Public Prosecutions, 1 February 2005, Divisional Court (UK)<\/li>\n<li>HM Customs and  Excise Commisioners and Long v A, Civ2003<\/li>\n<li>Huang and others  v Secretary of State for the Home Department, 1 March 2005, Court of Appeal  (Civil Division)<\/li>\n<li>Jones v Hipgrave  and another, 15 December 2004, Queen&#8217;s Bench Division<\/li>\n<li>Marcic v Thames  Water, 2003, Court of Appeal<\/li>\n<li>Mthokozisi v  Secretary of State for the Home Department, 20 December 2004, Queen&#8217;s Bench  Division (Administrative Court)<\/li>\n<li>Price and others  v Leeds City Council, 16 March 2005, Court of Appeal (Civil Division)<\/li>\n<li>R (on the  application of Lekstaka) v Immigration Appeal Tribunal, 18 April 2005,  Administrative Court<\/li>\n<li>R (on the  application of O&#8217;Reilly) v Blenheim Healthcare Ltd, 10 February 2005,  Administrative Court<\/li>\n<li>R (on the  application of Mehmeti) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department, 3  December 2004, Queen&#8217;s Bench Division (Administrative Court)<\/li>\n<li>R (on the  application of Taylor) v Governor of HMP Risley, 29 October 2004,  Administrative Court<\/li>\n<li>X v Commission  of the European Communities, 5 October 1994, Court of Justice of the European  Communities<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Human Rights Essays &#8211; Use Our Free Law Essays To Help You With Your Law Course<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[86,85],"class_list":["post-1883","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-free-law-essaysgeneral-law","tag-int-law","tag-uk-law"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.6 (Yoast SEO v26.6) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Human Rights Essays | LawTeacher.net<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Human Rights Essays - Use Our Free Law Essays To Help You With Your Law Course\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/free-law-essays\/general-law\/human-rights-law-2.php\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_GB\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Human Rights Essays\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Human Rights Essays - Use Our Free Law Essays To Help You With Your Law Course\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/free-law-essays\/general-law\/human-rights-law-2.php\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"LawTeacher.net\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LawTeacherNet\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LawTeacherNet\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"-0001-11-30T00:00:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/LT-large-logo.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1080\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"LawTeacher\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@LawTeacherNet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@LawTeacherNet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"LawTeacher\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"ScholarlyArticle\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/free-law-essays\/general-law\/human-rights-law-2.php#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/free-law-essays\/general-law\/human-rights-law-2.php\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"LawTeacher\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#\/schema\/person\/b99962c073c877c4ab8ee3d2486cd56e\"},\"headline\":\"Human Rights Essays\",\"datePublished\":\"-0001-11-30T00:00:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/free-law-essays\/general-law\/human-rights-law-2.php\"},\"wordCount\":2010,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"International Law\",\"UK Law\"],\"articleSection\":[\"General Law\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/free-law-essays\/general-law\/human-rights-law-2.php\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/free-law-essays\/general-law\/human-rights-law-2.php\",\"name\":\"Human Rights Essays | LawTeacher.net\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"-0001-11-30T00:00:00+00:00\",\"description\":\"Human Rights Essays - Use Our Free Law Essays To Help You With Your Law Course\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/free-law-essays\/general-law\/human-rights-law-2.php#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/free-law-essays\/general-law\/human-rights-law-2.php\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/free-law-essays\/general-law\/human-rights-law-2.php#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Human Rights Essays\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/\",\"name\":\"Law Teacher\",\"description\":\"The Law Essay Professionals\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"LawTeacher.net\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Law Teacher\",\"alternateName\":\"LawTeacher.net\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/LT-logo.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/LT-logo.jpg\",\"width\":250,\"height\":250,\"caption\":\"Law Teacher\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LawTeacherNet\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/LawTeacherNet\",\"https:\/\/api.whatsapp.com\/send\/?phone=447723491966&text&type=phone_number&app_absent=0\"],\"description\":\"Law Teacher provides academic writing services for law students throughout the world.\",\"email\":\"contact@lawteacher.net\",\"telephone\":\"+44 115 966 7966\",\"numberOfEmployees\":{\"@type\":\"QuantitativeValue\",\"minValue\":\"51\",\"maxValue\":\"200\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#\/schema\/person\/b99962c073c877c4ab8ee3d2486cd56e\",\"name\":\"LawTeacher\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4fdfab0a9ef25209f111018ecc8a983e19e57c5066a9277217a119582ccbeed3?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4fdfab0a9ef25209f111018ecc8a983e19e57c5066a9277217a119582ccbeed3?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"LawTeacher\"},\"description\":\"LawTeacher.net is the UK's leading provider of academic legal support, offering both writing services and an extensive collection of law study resources for students in the UK and overseas. Founded in 2003 by Grey's Inn graduate Barclay Littlewood, the Company was built on a commitment to excellence, with unique guarantees and a high standard of service from day one. The team includes over 500 UK legally qualified writing experts, with many practising solicitors and barristers, and several former lecturers.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\",\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LawTeacherNet\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/LawTeacherNet\",\"https:\/\/gravatar.com\/lawteacherprofile\"],\"knowsAbout\":[\"Contract Law\",\"Criminal Law\",\"Constitutional and Administrative Law\",\"EU Law\",\"Tort Law\",\"Property Law\",\"Equity and Trusts\",\"Jurisprudence\",\"Company Law\",\"Commercial Law\",\"Family Law\",\"Human Rights Law\",\"Employment Law\",\"Evidence\",\"Public International Law\",\"Legal Research and Methods\",\"Dispute Resolution\",\"Business Law and Practice\",\"Civil Litigation\",\"Criminal Litigation\",\"Professional Conduct\",\"Taxation\",\"Wills and Administration of Estates\",\"Solicitors\u2019 Accounts\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/author\/lawteacher\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Human Rights Essays | LawTeacher.net","description":"Human Rights Essays - Use Our Free Law Essays To Help You With Your Law Course","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/free-law-essays\/general-law\/human-rights-law-2.php","og_locale":"en_GB","og_type":"article","og_title":"Human Rights Essays","og_description":"Human Rights Essays - Use Our Free Law Essays To Help You With Your Law Course","og_url":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/free-law-essays\/general-law\/human-rights-law-2.php","og_site_name":"LawTeacher.net","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LawTeacherNet\/","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LawTeacherNet","article_published_time":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1080,"url":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/LT-large-logo.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"LawTeacher","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@LawTeacherNet","twitter_site":"@LawTeacherNet","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"LawTeacher","Estimated reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"ScholarlyArticle","@id":"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/free-law-essays\/general-law\/human-rights-law-2.php#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/free-law-essays\/general-law\/human-rights-law-2.php"},"author":{"name":"LawTeacher","@id":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#\/schema\/person\/b99962c073c877c4ab8ee3d2486cd56e"},"headline":"Human Rights Essays","datePublished":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/free-law-essays\/general-law\/human-rights-law-2.php"},"wordCount":2010,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#organization"},"keywords":["International Law","UK Law"],"articleSection":["General Law"],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/free-law-essays\/general-law\/human-rights-law-2.php","url":"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/free-law-essays\/general-law\/human-rights-law-2.php","name":"Human Rights Essays | LawTeacher.net","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#website"},"datePublished":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00+00:00","description":"Human Rights Essays - Use Our Free Law Essays To Help You With Your Law Course","breadcrumb":{"@id":"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/free-law-essays\/general-law\/human-rights-law-2.php#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/free-law-essays\/general-law\/human-rights-law-2.php"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"http:\/\/64.226.118.242:8001\/free-law-essays\/general-law\/human-rights-law-2.php#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Human Rights Essays"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#website","url":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/","name":"Law Teacher","description":"The Law Essay Professionals","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#organization"},"alternateName":"LawTeacher.net","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#organization","name":"Law Teacher","alternateName":"LawTeacher.net","url":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/LT-logo.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/LT-logo.jpg","width":250,"height":250,"caption":"Law Teacher"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LawTeacherNet\/","https:\/\/x.com\/LawTeacherNet","https:\/\/api.whatsapp.com\/send\/?phone=447723491966&text&type=phone_number&app_absent=0"],"description":"Law Teacher provides academic writing services for law students throughout the world.","email":"contact@lawteacher.net","telephone":"+44 115 966 7966","numberOfEmployees":{"@type":"QuantitativeValue","minValue":"51","maxValue":"200"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#\/schema\/person\/b99962c073c877c4ab8ee3d2486cd56e","name":"LawTeacher","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/wp.lawteacher.net\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4fdfab0a9ef25209f111018ecc8a983e19e57c5066a9277217a119582ccbeed3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4fdfab0a9ef25209f111018ecc8a983e19e57c5066a9277217a119582ccbeed3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"LawTeacher"},"description":"LawTeacher.net is the UK's leading provider of academic legal support, offering both writing services and an extensive collection of law study resources for students in the UK and overseas. Founded in 2003 by Grey's Inn graduate Barclay Littlewood, the Company was built on a commitment to excellence, with unique guarantees and a high standard of service from day one. The team includes over 500 UK legally qualified writing experts, with many practising solicitors and barristers, and several former lecturers.","sameAs":["https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net","https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LawTeacherNet","https:\/\/x.com\/LawTeacherNet","https:\/\/gravatar.com\/lawteacherprofile"],"knowsAbout":["Contract Law","Criminal Law","Constitutional and Administrative Law","EU Law","Tort Law","Property Law","Equity and Trusts","Jurisprudence","Company Law","Commercial Law","Family Law","Human Rights Law","Employment Law","Evidence","Public International Law","Legal Research and Methods","Dispute Resolution","Business Law and Practice","Civil Litigation","Criminal Litigation","Professional Conduct","Taxation","Wills and Administration of Estates","Solicitors\u2019 Accounts"],"url":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/author\/lawteacher"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1883","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1883"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1883\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1883"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1883"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lawteacher.net\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1883"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}